Toronto Zoo Strike Costs Toronto $4 Million

Last spring, the Toronto Zoo saw a strike over wages for its workers, which caused the Zoo to remain closed for 5 weeks while an agreement was reached.

The agreement gave the workers a 1.25-per-cent wage hike in each of the four years of their contracts and the non-union staff will be closely watched as the Zoo board will decide on what they will receive as a result.

Figures were released in a report on attendance and revenue which revealed:

The Zoo expected 218,012 visitors
Net forecast loss of $3.99 million

After they re-opened, they still saw a decrease in attendance of 65,125 due to cancellations of group trips and camps. With the addition of the pandas, attendance hit 1.3 million and is expected to dip once they are transported to Calgary.

Overall, August attendance levels were below target, but, still above 2016 levels with a rebound happening in September.

Devry Smith Frank LLP is a full service law firm that has a very experienced group of lawyers within our employee and labour law groups. If you are in need of representation, please contact one of our lawyers today or call us directly at 416-449-1400.

By: Nicolas Di Nardo

“This article is intended to inform. Its content does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon by readers as such. If you require legal assistance, please see a lawyer. Each case is unique and a lawyer with good training and sound judgment can provide you with advice tailored to your specific situation and needs.”

Posted onMay 26, 2021May 26, 2021/ Marty Rabinovitch

Temporary Layoffs during COVID-19 Can Amount to Constructive Dismissal under Common Law – Coutinho v. Ocular Health Centre Ltd., 2021 ONSC 3076 (CanLII)

In earlier blog posts, which can be found here and here, we wrote about the implications of Regulation 228/20 (the “Regulation”), enacted pursuant to the Employment Standards Act, 2000(the “ESA”). The Regulation states that non-unionized employees who had their hours reduced or eliminated due to COVID-19 are deemed retroactively to be on Infectious Disease Emergency [...]

Posted onFebruary 24, 2021February 24, 2021/ Marty Rabinovitch

Termination Provisions of Employee Stock Awards Agreement Found Unenforceable – Battiston v. Microsoft Canada Inc., 2020 ONSC 4286 (CanLII)

In 2018, an employee was terminated by his employer without cause following a tenure of nearly 23 years. In addition to his base salary, the employee’s compensation included performance-based cash bonuses and stock awards, which collectively accounted for approximately 30% of his income. The stock awards in question were awarded to the employee during his [...]

Posted onSeptember 15, 2020September 29, 2020/ Marty Rabinovitch

Temporary Layoffs During COVID-19 – “COVID-19 period” extended until January 2, 2021

On May 29, 2020, Ontario passed Regulation 228/20 under the Employment Standards Act (“ESA”). As a result of this new regulation, non-unionized workers who had their hours reduced or eliminated due to COVID-19 are deemed retroactively to be on Infectious Disease Emergency Leave, which is an unpaid, job-protected leave under the ESA. The regulation applies retroactively from March 1, 2020, and initially [...]

Posted onAugust 26, 2020September 2, 2021/ Marty Rabinovitch

Enforceability of Termination Clauses and the Latest Blow to Employers – Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc. (2020 ONCA 391)

Termination clauses are often relied upon by employers to define an employee’s severance entitlement when an employee is terminated without cause. These clauses are often drafted to limit an employee’s entitlement to their statutory minimums, which are significantly less than the employee’s entitlement at common law. If an employment contract contains no termination clause or [...]

Posted onJuly 20, 2020November 16, 2020/ Marty Rabinovitch

Employers Must Discharge Their Onus to Prove Failure to Mitigate

A recent 2020 decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court, Virk v. Satnam Education Society of B.C., was a reminder that in wrongful dismissal litigation, the employer has the burden to prove an employee’s failure to mitigate. When an employee has been wrongfully dismissed, they are obligated to act reasonably by taking steps to replace their [...]

LAWYER SEARCH